Wednesday, 5 February 2025

Governors, Trustees & Inclusion: How to spot what’s working in your schools

If you're a school governor or trustee, you’ll know that your role isn’t just about showing up to meetings and reviewing policies, it’s about making a real impact on the school community. You’re the bridge between strategy and practice, and your influence can shape an inclusive, high-quality education for every child.

Navigating the world of governance, especially when it comes to SEND, can feel like learning a new language. That’s why I’ve put together an example list to complement the checklist for Governors and Trustees, expanding on the key areas covered in the DfE guidance. This checklist isn’t just a list of responsibilities, it includes real, practical examples of what to look for in your schools and what evidence might be available to demonstrate effective inclusion. I have also created a simple Acronym sheet to support when discussing education in general terms, but also areas of SEND. 

The foundation of this checklist comes straight from the 'Special educational needs and disabilities: guidance for school governing boards for school governing boards'  (Yes, I do actually read these documents so you don’t have to!) The original framework sets out the statutory duties, but I’ve taken it a step further by giving you clear, concrete examples of what you might see in action at your schools. Please be aware that this is based on Primary School information, but I have created a link to the document should you wish to edit and add additional information. 

The checklist is packed with insights on:

  • How to tell if your school promotes an inclusive culture 
  • Ways to check parental engagement and communication. Are parents of SEND pupils involved, heard, and supported?
  • Ensuring the pupil voice is central to decisions about their support. What opportunities do pupils with SEND have to share their views?
  • Where and how SEN funding is allocated. Are interventions well-funded and effective?
  • How well your school works with the local authority on EHCPs and support services.
  • Whether your school’s SEND staff have the expertise and CPD they need to support all learners.
  • How progress monitoring is done, because data matters, but so do real outcomes for pupils.
  • Preparing for adulthood and transitions, Is the school setting up pupils for success beyond the classroom?

No more guessing: The acronym crib sheet

If you’ve ever sat in a meeting and felt like everyone was speaking in code, welcome to the club.  That’s why I’ve also pulled together a Crib Sheet of Education Acronyms, a quick-reference guide to help you decode all those terms (EHCP? APDR? DSL? Yeah, I've got you covered).

If you want to dig into the source material, you can find the DfE’s full guidance here: Special Educational Needs (SEN) and Disabilities Guidance for School Governing Boards

Word of warning: Some Acronyms are county specific, so may need changing. 

Checklist for Governors and Trustees

Governors and trustees will wish to be assured that:

The school promotes an inclusive culture

Evidence might include:

  • School vision and values explicitly reference inclusion.
  • Classroom observations show adaptive teaching strategies.
  • Whole-school CPD records demonstrate staff training on inclusive practice.
  • Data on participation in extracurricular activities by pupils with SEND.
  • Displays, assemblies, and newsletters highlight diversity and inclusion.
  • Case studies of how pupils with SEND are supported and included in mainstream settings.

There is effective communication and engagement between the school and parents of pupils with SEN and disabilities

Evidence might include:

  • Records of regular parent meetings, workshops, and support groups.
  • Feedback from parent surveys on school communication.
  • Evidence of co-production in EHCP reviews and SEN support plans.
  • Email/newsletter communication regarding SEND provision updates.
  • Minutes from SEND parent forums or coffee mornings.

Parents are involved in reviewing the school’s general SEN and disability policy and practice

Evidence might include:

  • Parent consultation meetings with feedback.
  • SEND parent representation in school governance or advisory groups.
  • Published SEN policies include references to parent contributions.
  • Evidence of responses to parental feedback in SEN policy updates.

The pupil voice is central to decisions about support for those with SEN and disabilities, at both individual and school levels

Evidence might include:

  • Pupil feedback recorded in One Page Profiles or EHCPs.
  • Participation of pupils with SEND in school councils or focus groups.
  • Visual or recorded evidence of pupils contributing to reviews of their support.
  • Pupil surveys on the effectiveness of their support.

Funding, including SEN funding, is allocated and spent effectively

Evidence might include:

  • SEN funding breakdown in budget reports (e.g., staffing, interventions, resources).
  • Costed provision maps showing how support is allocated.
  • Impact analysis of interventions funded by the SEN budget.
  • External funding applications for additional SEN resources.

The school works effectively with the local authority in reviewing SEN and disability provision

Evidence might include:

  • School SEND Information Report aligns with the Local Offer and includes the Trust offer.
  • Records of meetings with the LA regarding provision and EHCP processes.
  • Examples of referrals made to LA specialist services.
  • Evidence of engagement with local SEND networks or panels.

Staff have the expertise needed to support pupils with SEN and disabilities and access external specialist skills where required

Evidence might include:

  • SENCo training records, qualifications, and CPD logs.
  • Records of whole-staff and targeted SEN CPD.
  • Deployment of external specialists (e.g., Educational Psychologists, SALT, OT).
  • Case studies showing the impact of specialist support on pupil outcomes.

Governors and trustees should be satisfied with how the school:

Identifies pupils with SEN or disabilities and applies the 'graduated approach'

Evidence might include:

  • Clear SEN identification process in the SEND policy.
  • Examples of Assess-Plan-Do-Review (APDR) cycles.
  • Intervention records showing graduated response strategies.
  • Pupil Progress Meeting records demonstrating discussions on SEND identification.

Monitors the progress and development of pupils with SEN and disabilities

Evidence might include:

  • SEN tracking data and comparisons with whole-school progress.
  • Individual pupil progress reports.
  • Termly review meetings for pupils on the SEND register.
  • EHCP annual review reports with progress updates. 

Supports pupils in preparing for adulthood at each age and stage

Evidence might include:

  • Evidence of independence skills development in curriculum planning.
  • Transition plans for pupils moving between key stages.
  • Secondary transition records, including meetings with receiving schools.
  • Use of NDTi resources or other Preparing for Adulthood frameworks.

Governors and trustees of mainstream schools should ensure that the SENCo:

Achieves the relevant mandatory qualification within 3 years of appointment

Evidence might include:

  • SENCo’s qualification record (NASENCo certificate or equivalent, soon to be NPQSENCo qualifications).
  • Plans for training if newly appointed.

Has sufficient administrative support and time away from teaching to fulfil responsibilities

Evidence might include:

  • SENCo’s timetable showing dedicated SEN time.
  • Record of administrative support available for SEND administration.
  • Comparison of SENCo non-contact time with other strategic roles (e.g., DSL).

Is empowered to support high-quality outcomes for pupils with SEN and disabilities

Evidence might include:

  • SENCo’s role in strategic decision-making (e.g., SLT meeting minutes).
  • Whole-school improvement plans with SEND priorities.
  • Evidence of SEND focus in performance management objectives.

Schools have a duty to prepare and regularly update:

  • A SEN Information Report
  • Equality information (to demonstrate compliance with the Public Sector Equality Duty)
  • Equality objectives

Evidence might include:

  • Documents published on the school website.
  • Evidence of annual review and updates.
  • Published equality information document.
  • Data on participation and outcomes for different pupil groups.

An accessibility plan (outlining how the school plans to increase access for disabled pupils)

Evidence might include:

  • Accessibility plan published on the website.
  • Evidence of curriculum adaptations for accessibility.
  • Records of physical/environmental improvements (e.g., ramps, sensory areas).

Governors and trustees should also ensure that the school’s SEN and disability policy is reviewed regularly

Evidence might include:

  • Minutes from policy review meetings.
  • Parent and pupil consultation feedback.
  • Published updates with review dates.

Governors and trustees will wish to be assured that these documents help the school to:

  • Understand the impact of its policies, practices, and decisions on different groups of pupils.
  • Identify areas of inequality that may need to be addressed.
  • Help plan for the school to become increasingly inclusive over time.

Education Acronyms Crib Sheet

CPD: Continuing Professional Development

EEF: Education Endowment Foundation

EIF: Education Inspection Framework

ISDR: Inspection Data Summary Report

KS1/KS2: Key Stage 1 / Key Stage 2

LA: Local Authority

MAT: Multi-Academy Trust

NC: National Curriculum

SEF: Self-Evaluation Form

SDP: School Development Plan

SLT: Senior Leadership Team

 

Special Education

ADHD: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

ASC/ASD: Autism Spectrum Condition / Autism Spectrum Disorder

EHCP: Education, Health, and Care Plan

HI/VI: Hearing Impairment / Visual Impairment

MLD/SLD: Moderate Learning Difficulty / Severe Learning Difficulty

SEND: Special Educational Needs and Disabilities

SLCN: Speech, Language, and Communication Needs

 

Safeguarding and Attendance

CAF: Common Assessment Framework

CIN: Child in Need

CP: Child Protection

DSL: Designated Safeguarding Lead

FGM: Female Genital Mutilation

KCSIE: Keeping Children Safe in Education

LAC: Looked After Child

LADO: Local Authority Designated Officer

LESAS: LADO Education Safeguarding Advisory Service ()

MASH: Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub

PREVENT: Preventing Extremism and Radicalisation

CME – child missing education

EHE – Elective Home Education

IYCAF – In year casual admission form

KPAS – Kent Pru & Attendance Service


Governors and trustees, you have a huge role in making sure every child, especially those with SEND, gets the education and support they deserve. With this expanded checklist and crib sheet, I hope you’ll feel more equipped to ask the right questions, challenge where needed, and champion inclusion in your schools. 

Please feel free to download and edit as necessary:  Checklist and Acronyms

No comments:

Post a Comment